VACUUM EXTRACTION HISTORY
Attempts to use vacuum devices actually began in the 18th century but because the devices were difficult to create and the techniques difficult to implement, their use was soon abandoned. The first successful vacuum extractor was introduced in 1849 by James Young Simpson of Edinburgh, already famous for his forceps design. Technical problems still existed however and the vacuum extractor continued to be improved over time. Although popular in Europe as the method of choice for Instrumental Delivery, it has only gained popularity in the US more recently.
If the mother is into the second stage of labor, (meaning that her cervix is ten centimeters dilated and completely effaced) her membranes are ruptured and the fetal head is well-engaged into the mother's pelvis, then a vacuum extraction can be attempted. The reasons why a physician may want to utilize vacuum extraction are varied.
INDICATIONS FOR VACUUM EXTRACTION
Suspicion of fetal intolerance of labor
The is perhaps the most classic reason for instrumentation delivery. If the baby is low enough in the pelvis for vacuum extraction (or forceps delivery) to be effective, this can be an alternative that offers fewer risks to the mother and the baby than Cesarean Section.
In deciding to attempt a vacuum extraction, it is important for the couple to realize that it is indeed that, an attempt. Especially when it comes to obstetrics, clinical medicine is not an exact science. This means that a particular outcome of a delivery cannot be 100% predicted. It may be that a physician attempts a vacuum extraction and may still need to perform a Cesarean Section in the end.
Maternal Exhaustion
This would be indicated when they mother's pushing efforts have become ineffectual simply because she is physically exhausted with the efforts. If her second stage of labor has been prolonged, this can contribute to maternal exhaustion. Having a nurse or health care provider at the bedside to give feedback to her pushing efforts can help the mother to refine her pushing efforts to keep the second stage from being longer than it needs to be.
A mother pushing with an extremely dense epidural can also lead to maternal exhaustion.
Shortening of the Second Stage
For some maternal efforts, such as cardiac, neuromuscular and cerebrovascular disorders, pushing efforts are contraindicated or even impossible. For these cases, your health care provider may choose Instrumental Delivery.
Failure to progress in Second Stage
If the baby is low enough in the mother's pelvis, but no further progress has been made with maternal pushing efforts, your health care provider may choose to use a vacuum extractor to facilitate delivery.
CONTRAINDICATIONS OF VACUUM EXTRACTION
There are some reasons when vacuum extraction would not be appropriate for Instrumental Delivery. These include:
- Fetal gestation of less than 34 weeks
- Unengaged fetal head, or station in the pelvis above 0 station
- Incomplete cervical dilation
- Cephalopelvic disproportion - the baby's head is disproportioned to the mother's pelvis
- Malpresentation of the fetal head
- Presentation other than the fetal head
- Large fetal head
- Known or suspected blood clotting defects in the baby
Once the physician applies the cup portion of the vacuum extractor to the fetal head, vacuum is applied. This is performed either by a hand pump which the physician can control, or one which a nurse controls at the bedside. Both have gauges which indicate the appropriate range of suction. Once the vacuum is inside that range, the physician begins to apply traction with the handle portion of the vacuum extractor. The mother's bearing down efforts add to the process. As the contraction wanes, the suction is usually released.
RISKS ASSOCIATED WITH VACUUM EXTRACTION
No intervention, even as simple as having an IV, is without some risks. Just because a procedure is associated with risks does not mean those risks happen in all cases. The incidence of severe fetal injury from vacuum extraction is low, from 0.1 to 3 cases per 1,000 vacuum extraction procedures. The risks associated with vacuum extraction include:
Fetal Risks
Image via Wikipedia
Swelling and bruising at the scalp are the most common risks to the baby. These most often resolve without any addition intervention and are the result of the physics of vacuum against the scalp.
There is one type of hemorrhage which can occur in the baby as a result of vacuum extraction, but the incidence of this is very rare.
Vacuum extraction has not been shown to result in significant neurologic disability to the fetus.
Maternal risks
Vacuum extraction has a very low rate of maternal injury. There are no risks of vacuum extraction, (lacerations, stress incontinence, etc.) that are not also risk factors of vaginal delivery in and of itself.
BEFORE VACUUM EXTRACTION
Unless the indication for vacuum extraction is jeopardy of the fetus, the couple should be given an opportunity to discuss the procedure with their health care provider, to ask questions and have their questions answered fully.
This is also a conversation you can have with your health care provider well before labor ever begins to get a greater understanding of how he/she feels about this particular intervention. Do not be afraid to ask questions, and be sure that you fully understand the answers. This is your labor and your baby!
![Reblog this post [with Zemanta]](http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_e.png?x-id=dca86dfb-5147-44d6-8420-6f3efc749f57)








![Reblog this post [with Zemanta]](http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_e.png?x-id=3188943f-ad6c-48e1-8827-253cd80d40c4)


![Reblog this post [with Zemanta]](http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_e.png?x-id=727da219-4d25-40e2-9e5f-830dcd15f617)